To start with, the article “In Defense of Marriages” by John Cornyon aims to support the continuation of the legal protection, which is provided to the institution of marriage. The article written by the thesis panda service defines it as the act symbolizing the union of spouses, a man and a woman. Its major objective is persuading the target audience in the necessity to renew the amendment, which has been ratified by Bill Clinton.
The author claims that the institution of marriage has to be legally protected by the amendment, as there exists a problem of marriages’ legal persecution. The author emphasizes that the institution of marriage has always been the most respected and noble, and people tried to make efforts to preserve it on the legal basis. There exists a number of false arguments nowadays, which pose danger to the institution of marriage. For that reason, serious steps on the governmental level have to be taken to protect and secure it.
In this article, the author mentioned that every human being deserves respect, and institution of traditional marriage deserves protection. He emphasizes the necessity to preserve commitment to marriage, as it assists to raise the sound and happy society. According to this article, children are better raised in full families. Moreover, from the historical times, marriage was the only thing, which people of all nations and ethnicities always supported.
John Cornyon emphasizes that inability to preserve the amendment could result in marriages being considered unconstitutional. It is rather difficult to explain the essence of the article, as the author extended the main idea of the amendment ratification. However, it has to be stated that providing the discussion of legal cases which pose danger to marriages was not beneficial for the work. The author failed to explain the readers the benefits, which the couples might obtain after the ratification of the amendment. He had to highlight new opportunities, which this official certification of marriages could provide to the community. It turned out that the author constantly discussed the significance of marriage preservation but failed to explain the essence of it. It has to be noted that the ratification of marriage amendment might be considered rational only if it provides legal benefits to the couples. However, preserving the amendment just for the legal security is worthless.
The work is too official and lacks subjective viewpoint towards the issue under discussion. Cornyon has applied the traditional and well-known phrases but failed to provide his personal opinion. Moreover, it is necessary to note that marriages have to be secured by people, not laws. In other words, marriages concern feelings, human relationships, emotions, and these things are not subject to law. It has to be stated that when law determines human feelings, it is a signal that a marriage truly needs a certain sort of protection.
In conclusion, the article is a source providing the legal ground for the preservation of law amendment aimed at protecting the institution of family. Despite the fact that certain pieces of information it contained are extremely essential, the author has actually failed to appeal towards the mass audience. The significant gist was hidden under the surface of the legal text, but the author turned out to be unable to verbalize the major points of interests like the specific benefits provided to young couples by the government concerning their official certification of the desire to spend life together and support their marriage.
References
Cornyon, J. (2004). In defense of marriage. National Review. Retrieved from: http://www.nationalreview.com/article/211450/defense-marriage-senator-john-cornyn
